从 Poincaré 到 Navier-Stokes — 每一个千禧年大奖问题的解决声明、验证状态和专家反应，聚合在一个页面。
首个事件已收录：Buckmaster 的 Navier-Stokes 声明（2026-09-09）
On September 9, 2026, mathematician Tristan Buckmaster released a preprint claiming a solution to the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem — one of the seven Clay Millennium Prize Problems. The announcement exploded across Hacker News (1,182 upvotes, 520 comments), arXiv, and Reddit's r/math within hours. This is a once-in-a-decade event: the last comparable claim (Poincaré conjecture, 2002) reshaped entire fields and took years to verify. Journalists, educators, and CFD engineers are scrambling for reliable context.
Existing resources fail at the moment of peak urgency. Wikipedia's page lags by days; arXiv discussions are scattered across threads; Quanta's analysis takes 48 hours to publish. There is no single, structured place to see: What exactly did Buckmaster claim? Who has responded? What's the current verification status? This gap leaves even experts relying on rumor and fragmented social media.
Right now, the window of attention is wide open — and the community is actively debating the proof's validity. Whether the claim survives or collapses, the process itself is historic. A real-time tracker that documents each step — from claim to expert review to consensus — becomes the definitive reference. That's why Millennium Watch exists: to give you the signal, not the noise.
Our editors monitor arXiv, major math forums, and institutional announcements for any new solution claim related to the seven Millennium Problems. Each claim is logged with its author, date, and original paper link.
We aggregate public reactions from recognized mathematicians, HN commenters, and journal reports. Every mention is timestamped and linked, building an auditable timeline of the community's response.
For each active claim, we publish a summary that explains what the mathematician claims to have solved, why it matters, and where the verification stands — no PhD required.
Instantly see the latest state of every Millennium claim — submitted, under review, confirmed, or debunked. No more refreshing Wikipedia or digging through arXiv. We update within hours of new expert commentary.
Follow the verification journey: from the initial claim to the first skeptical comment, to detailed technical reviews by specialists. Every data point is sourced and timestamped, giving you a transparent audit trail.
We translate dense mathematics into accessible briefings. Understand what "global regularity for Navier-Stokes" actually means, why it's worth $1M, and what Buckmaster's paper claims — in under 5 minutes.