AimFast.Dev Daily · 2026-10-11

2026-10-11

> Among today's signals, the loudest isn't AI — it's \"device configuration\" and \"on-screen annotation,\" two corners big tech has long ignored. What you can...

阅读中文版 →

AimFast.Dev Daily · 2026-10-11

Among today's signals, the loudest isn't AI — it's "device configuration" and "on-screen annotation," two corners big tech has long ignored. What you can actually ship in 2 hours and start charging for today is carrier settings — the dirty work nobody wants to touch.

📝 Editor's Note

Today Product Hunt and HN are both buzzing about AI agents, AI voiceover, and AI game-building — the surface-level topics everyone's talking about. But the truly buildable signals are hiding in two corners: one is Carrier-Explode (decoding iPhone/Pixel/Galaxy carrier settings), with 410 points + 49 comments on HN, spanning 2 platforms; the other is big-arrow-on-the-screen (letting AI draw arrows and boxes on screen), with 412 points + 188 comments on HN — and 188 comments means a lot of people are asking "how the hell do I actually use this?"

Who pays first? Frequent international travelers, ROM-flashing enthusiasts, second-hand phone dealers — every time they switch carriers they have to wrestle with APN and MMS settings all over again, and carrier support pages haven't been updated in a decade. Why this week? Because both signals hit the HN front page today, and both are Show HN posts (personal projects, not big tech), which means the demand is real but supply is scarce.

Is a $19 "carrier settings cheat sheet" worth it? Yes — but not for pure developers. It's worth it for second-hand phone dealers and cross-border eSIM users. The genuinely hard part is that the data needs continuous updates (carriers change configs every quarter), and that's not something a one-off scraper can solve.

🎯 Today's 2-Hour Build

The "Cheat Sheet" Version of Carrier-Explode

Product name: CarrierCheat (Carrier Settings Cheat Sheet) One-liner: Enter your phone model + carrier, get a copy-paste-ready APN/MMS/hotspot configuration list, with plain-English explanations of why each parameter is set the way it is.

Supporting evidence: The original HN Show HN post got 410 points / 49 comments, confirmed across 2 platforms (HN + aggregator). The original project carrierexplode.com does "decoding" — digging out hidden configurations — but there's no version designed for regular people to copy. Many of the 49 comments are specific questions like "how do I configure my carrier," which shows the original project solved "visibility" but not "usability."

Why not the other two directions:

Not big-arrow-on-the-screen (HN 412 points / 188 comments): Higher comment count, but it's a "screen annotation tool for AI agents" — the buyer is developers, and someone's already building it (the open-source project itself). You can't differentiate in 2 hours. Most of the 188 comments are confusion about "what's this for," not "I want to buy this."
Not Onepin (AI voiceover, 328 votes): 328 votes on Product Hunt is impressive, but the AI voiceover space is already extremely crowded (ElevenLabs, Play.ht, etc.). A solo developer entering means hand-to-hand combat in a red ocean, and it requires heavy audio engineering investment — you can't build an MVP in 2 hours.

Pricing: $19 one-time report (per model + carrier combo) → $9/month subscription (config change push notifications, since carriers change parameters quarterly)

Fastest validation path: Today, post on Reddit r/NoContract, r/Visible, r/tmobile: "I put together a complete APN configuration for [carrier] on [phone model]. First 3 items free, full version $19." See how many people DM you within 24 hours asking for the full version. Don't build a landing page — people in these communities don't read landing pages, they read post bodies.

Keep the MVP manual: The first version is just a Google Form (collecting model + carrier) + you manually compiling it into Markdown and sending it back. Wait until you get 10 requests before considering automation. The core value of this work is data accuracy, not automation level.

Counter-perspective: If carriers start offering official configuration tools themselves (some already are), this product is dead. The risk is that you're selling an "information gap," and that gap will slowly be filled by official channels. Countermeasure: pivot to "cross-carrier comparison" and "second-hand phone verification configs" — two things carriers won't do.

📊 Today's Top 3 Signals

Signal 1: Device Configuration Decoding Is Becoming Its Own Category (Across 2 Platforms)

Carrier-Explode (HN 410 points / 49 comments) and big-arrow-on-the-screen (HN 412 points / 188 comments) both hit the HN front page today, and both are Show HN personal projects. This is not a coincidence — they point to the same trend: the "device low-level configuration" that big tech won't touch is being picked up by indie developers.

Cross-sources: HN Show HN × 2, GitHub Trending (morluto/rea reverse engineering tool, 72984 stars)
Plain English: Users are increasingly frustrated that "I can't control my own device" and are willing to pay for "being able to understand and modify it"

Signal 2: The "Infrastructure Layer" of AI Agents Is Starting to Cannibalize Itself (Across 2 Platforms)

Busabase (PH 355 votes, system of record for AI agents), Pine Computer (PH, cloud computer for AI), OpenPilot (open-source desktop AI agent), Together Link (using open-source models in a harness) — at least 4 "AI agent infrastructure" products on Product Hunt today. This marks the agent toolchain moving from "does it work" to "who's cheaper/more open".

Cross-sources: Product Hunt × 4, GitHub Trending (deepseek-harness, oh-my-pi)
Plain English: The window for selling "AI agent platforms" is closing, but the consulting window for "helping enterprises choose which agent platform" is opening

Signal 3: Cloudflare Shutting Down Deno Sparks Trust Discussion (Across 3 Platforms)

"Cloudflare shutting down Deno is news, not just PR" — 38 points, across 3 platforms (Lobsters + HN + aggregator). This is today's highest cross-platform signal. Core controversy: when big tech acquires an open-source project and shuts it down, how do developers protect themselves?

Cross-sources: Lobsters, HN, aggregator (3 platforms total)
Plain English: "Open-source project acquired by big tech = death sentence" is becoming developer consensus, and self-hosting/portability is becoming a new purchase justification

📖 Plain English Briefing

One core judgment: Today's strongest buildable signal isn't AI — it's "helping regular people get their device configurations sorted." Because the AI space is already crowded, while device configuration is dirty work nobody wants to do.

| Evidence | Discussion Volume | Plain English | |----------|------------------|---------------| | Carrier-Explode Show HN | 410 points / 49 comments | Carrier settings are a real pain point, but existing solutions only "decode," they don't let you "copy" | | big-arrow-on-the-screen | 412 points / 188 comments | Screen annotation demand is real, but the 188 comments are mostly confusion, not purchase intent | | Cloudflare shutting down Deno | 38 points / across 3 platforms | "Acquired by big tech = dead" is consensus; self-hosting is a selling point | | Playground by Google Labs | PH 227 votes / 12 comments | Big tech doing consumer game creation — solo developers should avoid the frontal battlefield | | morluto/rea reverse engineering tool | 72984 stars | Reverse engineering is being toolified, going from expert skill to product | | Onepin AI voiceover | PH 328 votes / 43 comments | AI voiceover is a red ocean, but "getting names/prices/dates read correctly" is a niche angle |

Reader Action Table:

| Reader Type | What to Do Today | |-------------|-----------------| | Tech enthusiast | Check out big-arrow-on-the-screen on GitHub, understand the "how AI operates screens" interaction paradigm | | Builder | Dig into Carrier-Explode's 49 comments — there are real paying-customer signals there | | Be cautious | Don't be fooled by PH's 355 votes — Busabase-type "AI agent system of record" already has 4 players. Red ocean. |

🔍 Opportunity Discovery

Solo-founder Product Launches

Signal: ToolForge v0.1.8 released (OSChina, 40 points), adding 11 practical tools in one go — an open-source desktop toolbox; MooTool Next 1.3.0 (OSChina, 36 points), rewritten with Electron + React.

Plain English: The Chinese developer community is embracing the "desktop toolbox" model — cramming 10-20 small tools into one app, attracting downloads with "one app solves N problems." ToolForge and MooTool both follow this pattern. This means the "tool collection" itself has become a product form, not individual tools.

Key judgment: The monetization challenge for desktop toolboxes is that "users only use 1-2 of the tools," so charging per tool makes more sense than an all-in subscription. Consider a "toolbox + individual tool unlock" model: $2.99 to unlock a single tool, $9.99 to unlock everything.

Counter-perspective: The ceiling for the toolbox model is low — users install it, use those 1-2 features, and the rest is dead weight. Without one "killer tool" anchoring it, it gets uninstalled fast. If none of ToolForge's 11 tools is a standout, it's just self-indulgence.

Surging Search Terms

No significant findings today (search trend anomaly category is empty).

Fast-Growing Open-Source GitHub Projects (No Commercial Version)

Signal: morluto/rea (GitHub Trending, 40 points, 72984 stars) — "Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries."

Plain English: Reverse engineering (taking compiled software apart to see how it works) used to be a skill for a select few experts. Now it's being toolified by agents. 72984 stars shows enormous interest in this direction, but there's no commercial version yet — it's all open source.

Key judgment: The commercialization path for reverse engineering is "providing compliant reverse engineering reports for security teams/competitive analysis teams." The buyers are product managers doing competitive analysis and engineers doing security audits — they need "conclusions," not "tools." A $99 competitive app tech stack analysis report makes more money than selling tools.

Counter-perspective: Reverse engineering involves legal gray areas (especially DRM circumvention). If you do this, stick to "public information aggregation" (e.g., which open-source libraries an app uses) and don't touch "cracking." Legal risk is the biggest pitfall in this direction.

What Developers Are Complaining About

Signal: "Don't solve problems that don't exist" (Substack/first1000, 7 points); "AI Got Better While I Was Away. Software Didn't." (DEV Community, 34 points, across 2 platforms).

Plain English: Today's most cutting complaint is the latter — "AI got better, but software didn't." Developers are noticing: AI capabilities are rising, but the software experience built with AI hasn't improved in step. This is an anti-AI-hype signal.

Key judgment: This hints at an opportunity — "AI software experience audits." Help teams check "is your AI feature just a wrapper?" The buyer is product leads who added AI but haven't seen retention improve. $499 one-time audit report.

Counter-perspective: This complaint might just be emotional venting from "developers having too-high expectations of AI," not real paying demand. To validate, you'd need to see how many product leads would pay for an "AI experience audit" — currently there's no evidence.

🛍️ Consumer Opportunities (New in v2.1)

Why the daily report missed this before: Because the scoring formula's buyer_clarity dimension defaults to looking for "engineering managers/CTOs," while consumer signals (games, Mac apps, desktop tools) have "regular users" as buyers, which doesn't score high in the formula. Today we dug out 3 from 127 consumer signals.

Consumer Opportunity 1: Cue — "Put in AirPods, Mac Enters Focus Mode Automatically"

Signal: Cue (Product Hunt, 42 points, 130 votes / 5 comments) — "Put your AirPods in, your Mac starts focusing."

Plain English: This is a small tool that triggers software behavior with hardware state. For regular people (non-programmers), the act of putting on headphones itself means "I'm about to focus." Cue translates that physical action into a Mac focus mode toggle. What regular people use it for: students writing papers, remote workers — they don't want to manually click "Do Not Disturb," they want "headphones on = don't bother me."

Who pays: Remote workers (especially those with 3-4 video calls a day). Why they'd pay: Manually toggling focus mode 5-10 times a day adds up to 2000+ times a year. $9.99 one-time to buy out that action is a bargain.

Pricing: $9.99 one-time (standard Mac App price)

Validation path: Launch on Mac App Store + post on Reddit r/macapps (this subreddit is dedicated to Mac utilities and is the first validation ground for consumer Mac apps). Don't use a landing page — Mac users search directly in the App Store.

Replicable pattern: The "hardware state → software behavior" trigger model. Similar opportunities: plug in charger → enable power-saving mode; connect monitor → hide Dock; close lid → pause downloads. These are all $4.99-9.99 small tools.

Consumer Opportunity 2: V2EX "Make Photos Move" Tool — Old Photos/Pets/Illustrations Animated

Signal: V2EX product launch (40 points) — "Made a small tool that makes photos move, supports old photos, pets, and illustrations."

Plain English: This is a consumer-grade tool that turns static photos into short videos. What regular people use it for: making "revival" videos of old family photos to post on social media, animating pet photos, adding motion effects to illustrations. This is classic "emotional consumption" — users aren't paying for features, they're paying for the moment of "making grandma's photo move."

Who pays: Family users aged 30-50 (especially children making memorial videos for parents). Why they'd pay: These tools have a low barrier on mobile and high emotional value. $4.99 one-time for HD export is totally acceptable.

Pricing: Free trial (with watermark) → $4.99 one-time to remove watermark + HD export / $14.99/month unlimited

Validation path: Post "old photo revival" comparison videos on Xiaohongshu + Douyin (before/after comparisons are natural viral material), put download link in comments. Don't use App Store pre-registration — Chinese consumer users come from Xiaohongshu/Douyin.

Replicable pattern: The "emotion + one-click" consumer tool. Similar opportunities: one-click pet birthday video, one-click old photo colorization, one-click travel Vlog templates. The core is lowering the barrier to emotional expression.

Consumer Opportunity 3: Playground by Google Labs — The "Consumer Version" of AI Game-Building

Signal: Playground by Google Labs (Product Hunt, 48 points, 227 votes / 12 comments, across 2 platforms) — "Create, play, and share your own games with Google AI."

Plain English: Google itself is entering the "regular people making games with AI" space. What regular people use it for: making a custom mini-game for a kid's birthday party, making an inside-joke game with friends, teachers making educational mini-games. This is the signal that "game creation" is going from developer-exclusive to mass entertainment.

Who pays: Parents (making custom games for kids), teachers (making interactive lessons), small businesses (making branded mini-games). Why they'd pay: The "uniqueness" of a custom game has social value. $9.99/year for unlimited mini-games is a bargain.

Pricing: Free basic version + $9.99/year ad-free + commercial license

Validation path: Publish on itch.io (itch.io is the top platform for indie and experimental games) + HN Show HN (HN favors minimalist, creative personal games).

Replicable pattern: "Big tech builds the platform, you build what big tech won't." Google Playground does general games — you can do vertical games: wedding interactive games, classroom icebreaker games, family gathering games. Big tech won't touch vertical scenarios.

Why the daily report missed this before: Because it's tagged "games," which the scoring formula classified as medium volume (143), but consumer_appeal scored a perfect 5 — a textbook case of consumer signals being systematically undervalued.

🛰️ Tech Stack

Big Companies Shutting Down/Downgrading Products

Signal: Cloudflare shutting down Deno (Lobsters, 38 points, across 3 platforms). n8n released 2.42.6 stable (GitHub Releases, 9 points).

Plain English: "Cloudflare shutting down Deno is news, not just PR" — meaning this isn't an ordinary PR statement, it's yet another case of big tech acquiring an open-source project and shutting it down. The developer community's reaction is "of course."

Key judgment: This reinforces the value of "self-hosted" as a purchase justification. Any project claiming "we got acquired by big tech but will stay independent" will get a question mark from users. When building products, put "exportable data, self-hostable" in your selling points.

Counter-perspective: But self-hosting is a burden for regular users (they have to maintain their own servers). So the real opportunity isn't "pure self-hosting" — it's "hosted but one-click exportable" — convenient without the lock-in risk.

Fastest-Growing Developer Tools

Signal: Cue (PH, 42 points); morluto/rea (GitHub, 40 points, 72984 stars); oh-my-pi (GitHub, 32 points, 34940 stars / 3798 forks, "⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in").

Plain English: The fastest-growing tools fall into two categories — consumer Mac utilities (Cue) and AI coding agents (rea, oh-my-pi). oh-my-pi's selling point is "IDE wired directly into the agent" — the coding assistant is no longer a separate window but embedded in your editor.

Key judgment: The competitive focus of AI coding tools has shifted from "how strong is the model" to "how deep is the integration." Whoever can seamlessly embed the agent into developers' existing workflows (IDE, terminal, Git) wins. The buyer is professional developers who code 4+ hours a day.

Counter-perspective: This space has giants like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf. The solo developer's opportunity is in "vertical integration" — like "an agent specifically for Rust developers" or "an agent specifically for data scientists."

Hottest HuggingFace Models → Consumer Product Opportunities

Signal: Today's model activity is mostly Claude/Gemini-related (Refs, Together Link, Gemini Agent). No clear single-model explosion signal on HuggingFace.

Plain English: No single model exploded today, but "Claude Dashboards & Motion" (letting Claude generate real-time dashboards and animated explanations) is worth noting — this is the direction of turning AI output from text into visualization.

Key judgment: The consumer product opportunity lies in "translating AI's technical output into visualizations regular people can understand." For example: turning AI-generated financial analysis into charts, turning AI-written code into flowcharts. The buyer is people who need to explain technical content to non-technical colleagues.

Counter-perspective: The value of visualization tools depends on "input quality." If the AI output is garbage, visualization just makes garbage look pretty. The moat in this direction isn't deep.

Important Open-Source AI Progress

Signal: OpenVids (PH, 42 points, 95 votes) — open-source video editor operated by chatting with an AI agent; OpenPilot (PH, 40 points, 100 votes) — open-source desktop AI agent supporting any model.

Plain English: "Open source + AI agent" is becoming the standard narrative for new products. OpenVids' selling point is "you don't need to learn video editing software, just tell the AI what you want." This lowers the barrier to video editing.

Key judgment: The monetization path for open-source AI tools is "open-source core + paid hosting/support." The buyer is teams that don't want SaaS lock-in but also don't want to self-maintain. $29/month hosted version + free self-hosted version.

Counter-perspective: The biggest problem with open-source AI tools is "users install them and don't know how to use them" — open-source projects typically have poor docs and steep onboarding. If you build this, make "5-minute onboarding" a core selling point.

🏭 Competitive Intelligence

Indie Developer Revenue and Pricing Discussions

Signal: APIPK (w2solo, 34 points) — for "developers, indie developers, and SaaS teams who need to choose an image generation API," compiling channel pricing and purchase terms; bg2x (w2solo, 20 points) — local AI image super-resolution tool; Curated Side Hustles (w2solo, 12 points) — Chinese side hustle case library.

Plain English: Today's discussions in the Chinese indie developer community (w2solo) center on "helping people make choices" — APIPK helps developers choose image gen APIs, Curated Side Hustles helps people pick a side hustle direction. This shows that "choice paralysis" itself has become a product.

Key judgment: The monetization for "helping people choose X" products is affiliate commissions + paid deep-dive reports. APIPK can partner with API providers for referral fees; Curated Side Hustles can sell "deep case breakdowns." The buyer is indie developers just starting out who don't know where to begin.

Counter-perspective: These "information aggregation" products have extremely shallow moats — anyone can copy them. The real barrier is data update frequency + community trust, not the information itself.

Dormant Old Projects Suddenly Reviving

No significant findings today.

"X Is Dead" or Migration Articles

Signal: ClickHouse outcompresses Parquet (Reddit, 24 points) — "ClickHouse beats Parquet on compression: an unexpected finding from our migration"; KaiwuDB community edition migration Skill (SegmentFault, 7 points).

Plain English: "ClickHouse beats Parquet" is a tech stack migration signal — teams are migrating from Parquet (a columnar storage format) to ClickHouse (an analytics database). The value of migration articles is that they expose the pain points of existing solutions.

Key judgment: Migration articles are "opportunity maps for next-gen tools." Every time someone writes "I migrated from X to Y," it means X has a batch of unhappy users. The buyer is teams currently using X and hitting the same pain points. You could make a "X → Y migration guide" paid document for $49.

Counter-perspective: Migration articles often have "survivorship bias" — the people who write articles migrated successfully, but the silent majority may have failed. Don't just look at success stories.

📈 Trend Assessment

This Week's Most Common Tech Keywords and Changes

Signal: Today's high-frequency words — "agent" (appears in Busabase, OpenPilot, OpenVids, Gemini Agent, morluto/rea and at least 8 others), "AI" (almost every PH product), "Carrier/config" (led by Carrier-Explode).

Plain English: "Agent" has completely replaced "chatbot" as the default term. But it's worth noting that the word "agent" is depreciating — when every product calls itself an agent, it's no longer a differentiator.

Key judgment: The next differentiating word is "verifiable" — because there are too many agents, users are starting to ask "how do you prove your agent did it right?" When building products, make "auditable, rollbackable" a selling point.

Counter-perspective: Keyword trends lag — by the time you see "agent" everywhere, the golden window has passed. The real opportunity is in directions that haven't become keywords yet.

VC and YC Topics of Interest

Signal: On Launch HN, Weekday (YC W21), Foster (YC W21), Legion Health (YC S21) — all "recruiting/mental health/writing" related, and all old YC batch projects re-launching. Nvidia in talks to acquire Reflection AI (HN, 114 points / 81 comments).

Plain English: Old YC projects re-launching on HN means they're looking for a second act — possibly a pivot or repositioning. Nvidia acquiring open-source model company Reflection AI shows big tech is acquiring open-source AI teams.

Key judgment: "Big tech acquiring open-source AI teams" is a double-edged sword — an exit for the acquired team, but "another project about to die" for users. When building products, don't bet your core dependencies on open-source projects that might get acquired.

Counter-perspective: Acquisition doesn't necessarily mean shutdown — sometimes it brings resources. But for indie developers, assuming the worst case (shutdown after acquisition) is the safer strategy.

Cooling AI Search Terms

Signal: 6 cooling signals, mostly "recruiting/job hunting" related (Weekday, Foster, Legion Health's Launch HN scores are low; "Should I even bother competing for React jobs?" only got 20 points).

Plain English: "Job hunting/recruiting" topics are cooling, especially anxiety posts like "React job competition" scoring very low. This shows developers are fatigued by "job hunting" discussions.

Key judgment: The flip side of cooling topics is opportunity — when nobody's talking about job hunting, "helping people find non-traditional income" (side hustles, indie development, remote work) has room. This is exactly the opportunity for w2solo's "Curated Side Hustles" type products.

Counter-perspective: Cooling might just be "seasonal" (recruiting season is over), not a long-term trend. Don't over-interpret single-day data.

New Word Radar: Concepts Rising from Zero

Signal: "Carrier settings decoded," "paint arrows on screen," "system of record for AI agents," "AI control tower" (TQStarling).

Plain English: New words cluster in two directions — device low-level control (carrier, screen) and AI governance (control tower, system of record). The latter is especially noteworthy: "AI control tower" means enterprises are starting to need unified management of multiple AI agents.

Key judgment: "AI governance/control tower" is the next B2B opportunity — when an enterprise uses 5 different AI agents, they need one place to monitor, audit, and bill them all. The buyer is IT leads at mid-size companies using multiple AI tools. $499/month.

Counter-perspective: "AI governance" is currently concept-first; real demand may not have arrived yet. Enterprises may still be in the "let's just use it first" phase — governance demand will only explode after something goes wrong.

🎬 Action Triggers

What to Do in 2 Hours / a Full Weekend (Detailed Version)

2-hour version (doable today):

Open the Carrier-Explode HN post and compile all the "how do I configure my carrier" questions from the 49 comments into a list.
Create a "carrier configuration help" form with Google Form, post it to r/NoContract.
Manually respond to the first 5 requests with Markdown config lists. Observe: how many people proactively ask "how much for the full version."

Full weekend version (48 hours):

Compile a config matrix of Top 20 carriers × Top 10 phone models (about 200 combinations).
Build a static site (with Astro or plain HTML), show 20% free, unlock the rest for $19.
Post simultaneously on r/NoContract, r/Visible, r/tmobile, V2EX.
Goal: 100 UV and 10 paid within 48 hours. If you don't hit it, abandon and log it in your lessons-learned file.

Pricing and Monetization Model Research

Today's pricing signals cluster in two ranges:

Consumer small tools: $4.99-9.99 one-time (Cue, bg2x, photo animation tool)
B2B AI tools: $29-499/month (OpenVids hosting, AI governance control tower)

Key insight: The ceiling for consumer pricing is "the cost of a meal" (under $10). Above that, you need a strong justification. The anchor for B2B pricing is "time saved × hourly rate" — if a tool saves 5 hours a month, at $100/hour that's $500 in value, so charging $99/month is reasonable.

Today's Most Counter-Intuitive Finding

Most counter-intuitive: The two highest-scoring Show HNs on HN today (Carrier-Explode 410 points, big-arrow 412 points) are both non-AI products. In an era of "AI everything," what draws the most attention is actually non-AI practical tools like "device low-level configuration" and "screen annotation."

What this means: Users have AI fatigue and are returning to "tools that solve specific problems." This is good news for indie developers — you don't need to know how to train models, you just need to solve a specific piece of dirty work nobody wants to touch.

Product Hunt and Developer Tool Overlap

Today's overlap between developer tools and consumer products on PH is "the AI agent's operating interface" — OpenVids (chat-based video editing), OpenPilot (desktop agent), Busabase (agent system of record). What these products have in common is wrapping "command line/API" into "chat/graphical interface" so non-technical users can use them too.

Opportunity: Find a tool that currently only has a CLI (command line) and build a chat interface for it. The buyer is regular users who want to use the tool but don't know the command line.

🔗 Sources

— AimFast.Dev Daily